“Reality has
a well-known liberal bias.”
-Stephen Colbert
In this post, I make an argument that is, perhaps, the most partisan argument imaginable.
-Stephen Colbert
In this post, I make an argument that is, perhaps, the most partisan argument imaginable.
Ready? Here it is:
Conservatives are biased.
But liberals are not.
Before you try pulling the beam out of my eye, however, hear
me out: The Pew Research Center just released a study
on political polarization and media habits.
The study includes some nifty tables
detailing the relationship between audience members’ political ideology and
their trust in various news sources. After
reading a Wonkblog
post about the study, I wondered whether there was any relationship between
trust in a news source and the political leanings of its audience. Here’s what I found:[1]
There is a strong, positive correlation (r = 0.7379) between
the general public’s trust in a news source and the percentage of liberals who
get news from the source. But there is almost
no correlation (r = -0.0210) between the general public’s trust and the
percentage of conservatives who get news from the source. That means that liberals are much more likely than conservatives to get news from
sources that are trusted by the general public.
Now, Pew’s sample skewed a little liberal. It’s possible that the sample is more likely
to trust news sources favored by liberals because the sample itself is slightly
liberal. To check for this, I ran the
numbers again using the trust of politically moderate audience members rather
than the general public. Alas, the
relationship persisted. There is a
strong correlation (r = 0.6669) between moderate consumers’ trust in a news
source and the percentage of liberals who get news from the source. There is a weak correlation (r = 0.1372)
between moderates’ trust and the percentage of conservatives who get news from
the source. So liberals are also more likely than conservatives to get news from
sources that are trusted by moderates.
One interpretation of this finding is that liberals can draw
from a wider range of sources to reinforce their views because the media has a
general liberal bias. According to this
interpretation, conservatives trying to avoid liberal bias have very few
options, and must resort to a small selection of conservative news sources that
are unfairly decried precisely because they are conservative.
However, I don’t think the data supports that
interpretation. First, liberals use balanced
sources more than conservatives. If
moderates’ trust[2] in
a news source is a good metric of its ideological balance, then the most
balanced sources are CNN and the major networks. Liberals are more likely to watch all these
sources than conservatives.[3] Additionally, liberals are less likely to use
distrusted sources. The five sources
most used by liberals (NPR, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, and PBS) are all trusted by
moderates. In contrast, three of the five
sources most used by conservatives (Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck)
are distrusted by moderates.[4] In fact, Rush Limbaugh is the least trusted
source among both the general public and moderates. Finally, liberals draw from a greater
range of sources than conservatives.
Because liberals draw from both more trusted and more numerous
sources than conservatives, liberals get a fuller and more accurate
understanding of the news. I (not so) humbly submit that this better understanding is not only why liberals are less biased, it’s
why we’re liberal.
[1] Methods:
I did all the calculations
using Excel with the tables provided by Pew.
General public:
I calculated a net overall
trust index by subtracting the percentage of overall distrust of
each news source from the percentage of overall trust of
each news source. I then used the CORREL
function to calculate the correlation coefficients of the net overall trust
index with (1) the percentage of consistently liberal respondents who got news
from each source, and (2) the percentage of consistently conservative
respondents who got news
from each source.
Moderates:
I calculated the net mixed
trust index by subtracting the percentage of respondents with “mixed” political
views who distrusted
each source from the percentage of respondents with “mixed” views who trusted each
source. I then used the CORREL function
to calculate the correlation coefficient of the net mixed trust index with (1)
the percentage of consistently liberal respondents who got news
from each source, and (2) the percentage of consistently conservative
respondents who got news
from each source.
[2] Unless
otherwise noted, “trust” refers to the trust index described above in note 1.
[3] Liberals
are more than twice as likely to watch CNN as conservatives (52% to 20%).
[4]
The most popular source among conservatives, Fox News, is trusted by moderates. Only 10% of moderates had heard
of the fifth most popular source among conservatives, TheBlaze. 2% of moderates
said they trusted TheBlaze, and 1% said
they distrusted it. Because TheBlaze is owned and founded by Glenn
Beck and the balance of moderates distrust the Glenn Beck Program, moderates
would presumably distrust TheBlaze if
they were familiar with it.
You cannot assume people with moderate political ideology are less biased than either liberals or conservatives. Having a moderate bias does not refer to the degree of bias but to where the bias points to.
ReplyDeleteModerates' trust of a news source is strongly correlated to the news source's lack of a face. In other words, moderates trust networks more than talk-show hosts. That is more likely why moderates trust Fox News but not Sean Hannity; they do not trust Glen Beck but twice the number of moderates trust The Blaze compared to those that do not trust it.
While i disagree with yoir initial statement, (really we all have some kind of bias) you make some interesting points that have got me thinking. My news sources are NPR, BBC News and a bunch of poscasts (many associated with NPR.)
It's true that moderates aren't necessarily less biased than partisans. That's the reason I refer to the sources moderates favor as "balanced" rather than "neutral." However, the utility of a metric doesn't stem from how well it "outruns the bear" but by how well it performs against other metrics. I decided that the trust of moderates was the best available measure of "balance" because Pew's sample skewed liberal, and that skewness would affect the reported "overall" trust in source.
Deletehttp://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2011/10/breyer_and_scalia_unintentionally_make_the_case_for_cameras_in_t.html
While there is a correlation between a source's institutional (rather than personal) character and whether it's trusted by moderates, I would speculate that this correlation stems from the partisan nature of personality-driven sources, rather than the fact that they're personality-driven.